🔗 Share this article

Do your LinkedIn connections recognizing you as a thought leader? Do numerous respondents applauding your advice on growing your business? Are headhunters reaching out to discuss opportunities?

Should that not be the case, the explanation might be your gender.

The Test: Modifying Profile Gender to achieve Increased Reach

Dozens of women participated in a collective LinkedIn experiment this week after viral posts indicated that changing their gender to "male" enhanced their network presence.

Other testers modified their professional summaries to include what they termed "masculine-oriented" terminology - adding results-driven professional jargon like "drive", "transform" and "expedite". Based on reports, their visibility similarly increased.

Systemic Preference Questions Raised

The engagement increase has caused some to wonder whether a built-in gender bias in LinkedIn's algorithm favors men who use professional networking terminology.

Similar to many large networking sites, LinkedIn employs an algorithm to decide which posts appear to which members - promoting some while reducing others.

Company Statement

In a recent blog post, LinkedIn recognized the trend but claimed it does not consider "personal characteristics" when determining content distribution. Instead, the company explained that "numerous factors" affect how posts perform.

Modifying profile gender on your profile does not affect how your posts appears in results or timelines.

Personal Experiences

Simone Bonnett, who modified her gender identifiers to "he/him" and her profile name to "Simon E", described remarkable results.

"The numbers I'm seeing indicate a sixteen-fold rise in visitor traffic and a thirteen-fold jump in content views," she commented.

Megan Cornish, a communications strategist, began experimenting after observing her audience decrease substantially.

The Process

• Initially, she modified her profile gender to "man"
• Subsequently, she used artificial intelligence to rephrase her profile using "masculine-oriented" language
• Lastly, she recycled previous content with similar "assertive" language

The outcome was immediate: a 415% increase in visibility within seven days.

The Downside

Although the success, Cornish voiced dissatisfaction with the method.

"Before, my content were more personal - brief and insightful, but also warm and relatable," she stated. "Now, the bro-coded version was assertive and self-assured - like a white male swaggering around."

She abandoned the test after seven days, saying "Every day I continued, and outcomes got better, I became angrier."

Varying Outcomes

Some participants encountered favorable outcomes. One writer who modified both her profile gender to "male" and her ethnicity to "white" reported a decrease in visibility and engagement.

"We know there's systemic preference, but it's extremely difficult to understand how it functions in specific cases or the reasons behind it," she remarked.

Broader Implications

These experiments coincide with ongoing conversations about LinkedIn's distinctive position as both a professional network and community site.

Recent changes in recent months have reportedly resulted in women professionals experiencing markedly lower exposure, leading to unofficial tests where the same posts by male and female users received dramatically unequal audience engagement.

Technical Explanation

Per LinkedIn, the platform uses AI systems to classify and spread content based on various elements, including what's shared and the member's career profile.

The company states it frequently assesses its systems, including "checks for inequalities based on gender."

Company representative proposed that current reductions in some users' reach might originate from higher volume due to additional posts on the platform.

Changing Landscape

As one participant observed, "bro-coding" appears to be increasing on the network.

"Users typically consider LinkedIn as more businesslike and refined," she commented. "This is evolving. It's turning into increasingly aggressive and less controlled."